A third more projects delivered
with informed trade-offs.
Your teams are saturated, and demand for projects keeps growing. The answer is not to add resources: it is to stop the projects that will never land, and reinvest in the ones that count. On a portfolio of 30 projects, that is 8 to 10 more projects landing every year.
Already adopted by 100+ CIOs of mid-market companies and large groups
Kiabi · Valrhona · Leroy Merlin
with informed trade-offs.
by stopping what will never land.
teams aligned asynchronously.
A steering hub that gives executive and management committees the right level of visibility.

Making alignment between the business, IT and executive management real.

A new way of bringing teams on board.

Strategic steering with AirSaas, execution with Asana.

Your teams are working flat out. And yet your priority projects are not moving. Here is where the capacity goes.
Everything is a priority, so nothing is. Every project moves, none of them lands.
Teams at 130% on paper, and nobody can say no with facts.
You invest, you deliver, and nobody comes back to measure whether the promised benefit materialized. The system never corrects its mistakes.
Information scattered across a proliferation of Excel files and PowerPoints: committees that take note, out-of-date slides, decisions postponed month after month. How many projects have you actually stopped in the last 12 months?
These four losses tie up the capacity that would get your priority projects over the line. The cost of the status quo is not just a wasted budget: it is everything you do not deliver.
You gave your teams a task management tool (Jira, Monday, Planner…). Good decision. But your organization is not creating any more value for it, and your strategic projects are still just as late.
Because equipping the teams is not the foundation. It is the furniture. You assembled the furniture before starting the renovation. The real foundation: choosing the right projects, delivering them at the right time, measuring what they return. Executing the wrong projects well is accelerating into the wall.
Read the full analysis
Make your portfolio trade-offs. On facts, not slides.
Say no with facts. Keep your commitments.
Frame the demand. Prove the benefits.
Prepare the trade-off. Stop compiling.
A living budget, tracked quarter by quarter against what is actually delivered.
The Quarter Plan method, built with more than 60 CIOs and transformation leaders, installs four disciplines:
Every request is qualified: expected value, estimated workload, sponsor. No more portfolio filling up through affinity.
By team, at quarter granularity. Every request runs into it. Saying yes to one project means saying no to another, with your eyes open.
The entire portfolio gets reviewed: continue, stop, postpone. Decisions are on the record. Dead projects do not survive the quarter.
Six months after delivery, is the promised benefit there? Every trade-off makes the next one smarter.
The capacity you free up is not a cost-saving line. It is the room to manoeuvre you were missing in order to deliver what counts.
The two or three strategic initiatives you kept pushing back for lack of bandwidth get started, and land.
Costed scenarios to compare, not a wish list. You decide; you no longer absorb the budget.
For the first time, you can answer hand on heart: yes, this project kept its promise.
94 projects in parallel, everything a priority, nothing landing
The budget voted in December, out of date by March
Teams at 130% on paper, and nobody can say no
Benefits promised, never verified
Two to four PMO days a month on project PowerPoints
A portfolio decided every 90 days: fewer projects, more of them landing
A living budget, decided again each quarter against reality
Real capacity made visible: saying yes to a project means seeing what it displaces
Promised against realized: the benefits view, ready for the ExCom
The flash report in one click: the PMO prepares the trade-off, not the scenery
Four blocks, one logic: fewer projects, better chosen, actually delivered, benefits verified.
Demand for projects is exploding, capacity is not keeping up, and the reflex answer is to ask for more: more budget, more hiring, more contractors. The capacity trade-off takes the problem from the other end: it frees the capacity you already pay for, tied up by projects with no value, and reinvests it in what counts. The leader who runs this ritual no longer asks the ExCom for more resources: they deliver more results with the resources they have.
No gadget AI: agents that remove the data-entry and formatting work, so human time goes to the decision.
Drop in your documents and the agent structures the framing sheet: objectives, expected benefits, proposed milestones.
AI proposes the list of milestones and suggests the dates. The project manager adjusts; they no longer start from a blank page.
The essentials of the project review on one slide, generated from up-to-date data. No more Sunday-night PowerPoint.
Query your projects in plain language from Claude or ChatGPT, through the AirSaas MCP server. Secure read access, data in Europe.
companies make their portfolio trade-offs with AirSaas, from Kiabi to Valrhona and Leroy Merlin.
stopped on average at the very first trade-off, with the capacity reinvested in the priorities.
fewer project meetings after four months: the ritual replaces the status committees.
No user licences: everyone gets access to the tool, from the project manager to the ExCom. You pay €60 per active project per month, and when you stop a dead project, your bill goes down. We do not gain from inflating your portfolio, we gain from making it more productive.
The calculation you are doing right now — let us do it together. A portfolio of 30 active projects is €1,800 a month, all in: unlimited users, all 4 blocks, the connectors, the AI agents. Stop 8 of them in the first quarter? The bill follows.
For reference, that is about 0.2% of the cost of a project, to secure the decision that determines 100% of its value.
“At the first quarterly trade-off, we stopped eight projects and reinvested the capacity in the three that carried most of the value.”
CEO, mid-market manufacturer
stopped at the first Quarter Plan, with the capacity reinvested in the strategic priorities
Full case studies on the customer stories page.
“It is not a tool. It is an approach, a discipline, a practice.”
Industry
Eyewear, retailHeadcount
3,000“It was still about trust, but trust with a process behind it.”
Chantal GuilmainIndustry
RetailHeadcount
2,500“When you have 120 projects for a head office of 270 people, you either get organized properly, or you question the project.”
Guillaume MarloisIndustry
Food & beverageHeadcount
850“We stopped pushing everything forward at once. We deliver fewer projects, but we deliver the ones that count, all the way.”
“Real capacity on screen in committee put an end to the opinion debates. We decide on facts, in three hours a quarter.”
“My role has changed: I no longer compile slides, I prepare the trade-offs. And people listen.”
The ritual takes hold quickly, but every organization starts from a different place. Three levels, from the most self-sufficient to the most supported, and nothing more than what you need.
Guided setup, onboarding for the project managers, first review co-facilitated. What it takes to launch the ritual next quarter.
Our teams prepare and co-facilitate your trade-offs through the first quarters, until you are fully self-sufficient.
Support from C-levels who have done your job — former CIOs and former transformation directors of large groups — working alongside your sponsors.
A 2-hour framing session, you send us your files (existing Excel, PPT), we deliver a first portfolio within a week. And next quarter: your first Quarter Plan Day, co-facilitated by our teams, on your first scope.
No user licences: everyone gets access to the tool, from the project manager to the ExCom. Stop a pointless project and your bill goes down.
If the ritual does not take, you walk away at no cost. We take the risk with you.
Those are task management tools: they are there to execute a project. And an organization often has several (Jira in IT, Asana or Monday on the business side, and so on), because each team executes its own way. AirSaas replaces none of them: it sits above, as the portfolio steering layer, and it is cross-functional. That is why a company has several execution tools, but only one AirSaas. And it is not reserved for the ExCom: project managers and POs keep their projects up to date in it, PMOs prepare the trade-offs in it, decision-makers decide in it. Most of our customers keep their task tools and add AirSaas on top.
It is a different job. Abraxio does the management accounting of the IT department: budget, suppliers, chargeback — the inside of the house. AirSaas does portfolio steering and governance: what we launch, what we stop, what it returns, with the business, executive management and the ExCom. Many of our customers have both: one keeps the IT department's accounts, the other governs its investments.
Not in the sense that everyone would have to abandon their tools. AirSaas is the single place where the portfolio is steered, so it is used where that happens: project managers and POs keep their projects up to date in it, PMOs and the CIO Office prepare the trade-offs, decision-makers decide. Teams keep their execution tools (Jira, Asana, Monday) and AirSaas connects to them. We roll out on the scope that matters, not by imposing the tool on the whole company at once.
The model follows the portfolio, not the headcount: €60 excl. VAT per active project per month, unlimited users. Stop a pointless project and the bill drops accordingly. It is a governance cost that pays for itself on the first project stopped, not one more per-seat licence to defend every year.
From the reference studies on portfolio waste (PMI, Gartner: 10 to 15% of project investment with no realized benefit) and from what our customers find at their first trade-off. We have gathered all those studies in a Q&A space: ask your questions about the cost of waste directly there.
A 30-minute demo on your own context. We show you the ritual, you judge.